From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: ob-haxe Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ian martins Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 17 23:42:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Gkx-0007Zw-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 23:42:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Gkw-0000RF-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Gk9-0008Qz-M8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:35759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Gk7-0005TE-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:57 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1008101C9B; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 291AD100216; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610923313; bh=Pi3Qig4SOxvQpIF/yDDD/2mH8J4C9dVh1p7hezAxBzs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RjNGkFl8aXhQu/wusxTLVzlY339QdNMBFLqWGuC2rWANdvJbDYW5GYc7HPVudWoUu gjdQ4bOCLvpc6m84O8levKHc6Dk7td0WIO5k4MO5fw9jySXFoZCO+N2K0N0fE0tKVe KPMUkBL5vQwfsVgJDd4mxZA7oXjYqY5KTGvZ5oyTghUBvW/0in3vYu9d8jeA64d58B 0ubFuIbNqouQ5gLMmmhvYCwtFZ1jyZnGOiSPQZ/22bmVb+Gy5aEc4pUgaWeMiBbXb8 S48g8ivjYAm+HAZQG90+btZh5bROAwiXCQKMysXgh/f3VxUY/a+G8QSjuIT3kWRE7B m5DsqX9kRGkCA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7081120250; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:41:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (ian martins's message of "Sat, 16 Jan 2021 07:48:49 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263136 Archived-At: Hi Ian, > Hello. I'd like ob-haxe [1] to be added to gnu elpa. It is an > org-babel integration for the haxe programming language [2]. I don't > have push access to ELPA. I'd be happy to do that, but just to be sure, I'd like to understand something first. AFAICT, all other `ob-.el` files are currently bundled with Org. Personally, I'd tend to consider that the language-specific info for org-babel should belong with the major mode (just like the language-specific support for indentation, highlighting, flymake, imenu, etc.. belong to it). [ Side note: I'm not sufficiently familiar with org-babel to know if bundling the info with the major mode is currently technically realistic. ] So based on the above, I'd expect `ob-haxe` to be distributed either with Org or with `haxe-mode` rather than separately. What do you (and the Org maintainers and the haxe-mode maintainers) think? Stefan