From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Easy configuration of a site-lisp directory Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y29cj65y.fsf@posteo.net> <87tujgv7y1.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7fd93pu.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34190"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 16:38:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIu2g-0008eS-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIu2f-00068D-0h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIu1c-0004UG-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIu1Z-0005B0-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EADD9809C6; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8EBC38078F; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1629902221; bh=w7gcF4geVBFL4IlSnWi8SZx6uqywbUSYSbLjIHZaJwE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FxtsrLRRO/3nEzrBdTBWLqSOj3Wp86IKpuVg8yZXz6syQHTKy61coVEyaf7KRj1WR +JixBs3KnUHOTSBIIrB6TyPVnQDgi//ixNkFYdh+cD+MKC+cTcJdEBupxd5XCfCFK0 GRGBxXhIaT0KBgJrj+Xq50NTicEBAgOJ90U4Uk2btg5bTwFiY3ge9Zv7/sw08XdBR+ 7HhTg8q/JLAY+wt0qk9r3z67dg6MJpneHPTrNpVjdQgb7GeCPWVrSaDBKbopZ/Y3Y5 VLuCgy0lJOfw76kgjATfAww+J6lQfZr2CEPwdlP0rrsB4WwkggeuFrNP/+NsE9hW09 wQklXqvvyevaA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 683631203C4; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:37:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87h7fd93pu.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:13:49 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272980 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic [2021-08-25 11:13:49] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> Max Brieiev [2021-08-23 12:14:46] wrote: >>> So is there any conclusion in this long thread about preferable setup >>> for the case described in the original post? And making local git >>> repositeries be package.el aware. >> >> From my point of view, the "preferable setup" is for someone to spice up >> `elpa-admin.el` to make it more user-friendly for that use-case. > > I could look into this, because I was intending to work on elpa-admin.el > a bit anyway. But this would mean that it wouldn't work OOTB, right? Not sure what you mean by that, but I'm pretty sure the answer is no. My suggestion is quite vague, includes things like extracting the *ideas* but rewrite them differently or copying the few relevant parts of the code, ... Stefan