From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Rename .dir-locals.el to .dir-locals.eld Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15837"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 21 02:11:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAiT2-0003wk-2d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 02:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAiT0-0006u7-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 20:11:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAgjQ-00057X-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAgjN-0006d3-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7666F100186; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10411100139; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:34 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642720834; bh=4ga1sDF7OZ1PtMFRoyvvx2CDav9v9+wAv1K0TafNGzg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=T/KoYdzQutjfym8r8LKh8qh2iAz+eaNdkvh86Rmamn2FKBbQXgH2m5bsq5JUfIP3z VSbLnTNXpADqkMNioQUW9oNy0+q63epwWvKb4WSIxFQUYqE11vtAdl/N+p2BihmjWe iIbABh3Wmf+MCx9S0Fl0w2H47IQsjH6kI/7i8DqzmPxo8eHH7xn33do8LV2e94Zp3k QjQgQYCnXTl1OgdYhRf3UZhMiVxOYrQPTaZNRTAPIsJUV9WTzkjq18YAqkr1Kah5Ld 2lxjGsnhmAUqfc4txJ76MG+80Mva+jQYQzWiOW2n+maxof5O7D2zWKmdIYzlZ/j7YB JuClayaqXy1Eg== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1627120387; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:20:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:14:47 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285067 Archived-At: >> I think we should restrict the `.el` extension for files which contain >> actual ELisp code rather than files that just contain text in ELisp's >> sexp format. WDYT? > > 1. Why do you think so? > > 2. Isn't every Elisp sexp "code"? How are you > going to distinguish "code" from other sexps? Again? We already went through this discussion. And the result is `lisp-data-mode`, which the major mode I'd recommend we use for `.eld` files. Stefan