From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reworking loaddefs.el generation Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 15:04:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ee0f8cvx.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37482"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 21:06:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nw7Ce-0009Yc-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 21:06:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw7Cd-0002BF-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:06:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw7Ax-0000u8-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:9747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw7Au-0004Ts-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C9C561008D2; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:05:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A9F7A1003CC; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:04:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1654023899; bh=EKWMFI309QkOfiWceEoHtcckd0cP8rc4j7Ptk3fbJRw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=m90G6VTMJuFHlSnjT4g5mziG2wuILbiL9ewWo9q0+6rZJxN2w30mh5MS6y6PKStkI Ea3U2QJckzNQq45+zTNxwhGmx/Xy8xflgHYKV7Ztbqvym6AQNEuvERggPyc7FFmJFk yhZws9bABJ2mfDvp0WZHrOqS0VBtq/Z73yJaBEVlCs0g0ulFp738rZXHZwR+hqCYxh C7MfvpWGZ+bUIuXdCIRWT3EKOC/vQ2UFGeNz7N5bDuTzlCtqwPDN/XvnMlIG+VqROM cLQL9NLapz6rs1HH3kszA3USNw4aHlY22sxPCF7UKaCTr+zQBrBveNaFeUxjp+NmXf W6x5FtSLCgGaQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DC412013F; Tue, 31 May 2022 15:04:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 31 May 2022 18:44:22 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290443 Archived-At: > The first isn't too bad, because it's small, but org.texi is taking > ~20 seconds to generate on my machine (which is doing nothing else at > the time) plus, perhaps, 3 seconds for org.info. The generation of `org.texi` from `org.org` is excruciatingly slow, indeed. Maybe we can better hide that latency with a more careful scheduling, but maybe we could also try to speed it up: I mean if you compare it to the time it takes for texi2pdf to process the result it's rather shameful (after all, the generation of the `org.texi` seems algorithmically a lot simpler). Stefan