From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PGTK-related misconceptions Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y202f4dq.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87o80xhor2.fsf@yahoo.com> <877d7lrbta.fsf@treypeacock.com> <87czdszy2r.fsf@akirakyle.com> <875yjkzkuc.fsf@yahoo.com> <87tu742hy6.fsf@gnus.org> <871qu8vyp0.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Akira Kyle , Trey Peacock , Morgan Smith , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 16:27:44 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHQxs-0002Xa-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 16:27:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60626 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHQxr-0007y4-HK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHQwy-0007Gd-MR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:25215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oHQwv-0006fZ-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:47 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A3624805C8; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 51C8680506; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1659104802; bh=GSKM/dtEg6uOmi5GNNzLScJIfNqDBz9G73iZrmvaOxs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=aFIE/ylB+hVrlZeGFleeNnLsKplQubKt/VStnzoVv80VvmaCg7PTxhteik4ldOHtq ggfEybsyETNQ5fWIADWJh8ZDjd7wzyUsPQYXlgcmmPG0YCkxMqyJCzmhPrMrryKmZ3 LfR8o5efp4EuWgQQlIXF7IIjuyC8QaxCGMM+CL3qP/G1sn7YoGGCdV+1rOWTx7wG8R 7jyxYUTdAbMpAYneEWQrFCiHdwnknmepDXIe4jeGcJNB035DuwgpBU42TMZ7hmSJI/ pe2lJBvtZPTzt9unEBscf4KEnLXeyzGs4ieH8l3AoB7pSNEpNmzdIDXKOBh71Q31Ul dh3pvxJXf/Ptg== Original-Received: from milanesa (dyn.144-85-172-183.dsl.vtx.ch [144.85.172.183]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A7A9120302; Fri, 29 Jul 2022 10:26:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871qu8vyp0.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:35:39 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292836 Archived-At: >> Adding a workaround for what is apparently a really common problem here >> sounds like something we just have to do. > I'd rather document the workaround here in etc/PROBLEMS, once Akira > confirms that it works. There should be a matching bug report in Sway, right? Stefan