From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc.el and CSSC Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:00:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18442.7542.570702.854133@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18442.25458.425066.154658@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18442.26903.717960.503039@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208981462 30686 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2008 20:11:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ulrich Mueller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 22:11:37 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JolJN-0008NO-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JolIh-0007QD-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:10:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JolHx-0006RH-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JolHw-0006Pc-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54039 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JolHw-0006PK-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jol8g-0008KJ-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:00:22 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArwEAB8yD0hFxIud/2dsb2JhbACBUqxX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,701,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="18968372" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2008 16:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([69.196.139.157]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id DYX35821; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 40A9B8064; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:00:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <18442.26903.717960.503039@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> (Ulrich Mueller's message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:50:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95858 Archived-At: >>> Can you check if the patch below fixes your problem as well? >> At least a quick test of checkout, checkin, and diff succeeds. > On second thought, you have to be more careful here: > "get" and "sccs get" are not completely equivalent, but the "sccs" > variant prepends an "SCCS/s." to its filename arguments before passing > them to "get". > While CSSC seems to play nicely with it, I don't know if all SCCS > variants will be happy if the "sccs" wrapper is called with SCCS > master filenames. I'm tempted to leave it in and wait for people to complain, at which point we'll know better what the problem really looks like. > So probably vc-sccs-master-templates shouldn't be used for filename > manipulation in this case ... Yes, maybe we good get rid of vc-sccs-master-templates, which would be good as well. > But to play it safe, I would suggest to stay with the present form of > the commands, without the "sccs" wrapper. There's plenty of time to fix potential breakage on the trunk, Stefan