From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ^M in the info files Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <484F1FAB.6070005@gmail.com> <487481B2.3090302@gnu.org> <87vdzdtwvm.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216664456 3487 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2008 18:20:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, lekktu@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 21 20:21:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KL00o-0004rA-Im for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:21:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzzv-0000N2-G5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzzi-0000Is-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzzg-0000HJ-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53179 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzzg-0000HD-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:60234) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KKzzW-000241-2d; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor.home (vpn-132-204-232-79.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.79]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6LIKSlP011056; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B3AD51C523; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:20:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:08:01 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3064=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101106 Archived-At: >> >> > But maybe in this case we should force some safe coding like `undecided' >> >> > (as it seems to use now for pure ASCII Info files without null-bytes)? >> >> No, I think it should use `us-ascii' instead. >> >> > That is almost certainly a bad idea: no need to punish users who have >> > non-ASCII Info files without a proper `coding' tag. >> >> How common is that? > Quite common, especially in Latin-n world. If you say so. It's defnitely not commmon in my part of the latin-1 world. Stefan