From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New interactive spec Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873a4nqws0.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257804239 10530 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2009 22:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Didier Verna Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 23:03:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N7cL0-0000tb-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:03:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43305 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cKz-0007ic-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cKt-0007fe-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cKo-0007dE-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33582 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7cKo-0007d3-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34824) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7cKn-0008Mp-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:03:37 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nA9M3ZVn021554; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 21BE63A1DA; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:03:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <873a4nqws0.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:16:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3402=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116763 Archived-At: >> I've recently modified the behavior of switch-to-buffer in XEmacs so >> that the completion mechanism doesn't include the current buffer. In >> doing so, I figured it would be generally useful to have an >> interactive spec for that (meaning "a buffer except the current >> one"). I was thinking g/G because that's the next thing available to >> us, but I'm wondering if GNU Emacs already uses it, or if you'd have >> another suggestion. > "G" is already taken, but "g" would be free. > G -- Possibly nonexistent file name, defaulting to just directory > name. How important is it to have a letter for it? Stefan