From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 96, Issue 98] Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <834ob09ccq.fsf@gnu.org> <83zksr97gg.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd3fzi90.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291181230 13060 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2010 05:27:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 05:27:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 06:27:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNfDZ-00072A-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:27:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47989 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNfDY-0007ys-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43098 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNdzN-0006Oe-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNUpv-0006dI-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNUpv-0006aQ-Ja; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAUILpnL017370; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BDA18A85ED; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87vd3fzi90.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:56:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3695=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133250 Archived-At: > I have checkouts of both the trunk and emacs-23 taken minutes before > savannah went down: revisions 102543 and 100249 respectively. (Savannah > went down just as I was committing to the trunk, and for a minute I > thought my commit had somehow crashed *.gnu.org). > So, a simple "bzr push" from the bound branches should do the trick? All that matters is that noone commits until the latest commit has been pushed back onto savannah. So, I'd urge everyone to try "update/pull" first, then "push", and then wait for a day (or two) before committing, in case someone else already has a more recent version of the branch. Stef