From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:21:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87lj0qstpw.fsf@speer.lan> <87lj0oyfar.fsf@speer.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299702067 5467 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2011 20:21:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lute Kamstra Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 21:21:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPsT-0004hu-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:21:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPsS-0005gq-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37857 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxPsN-0005eu-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:20:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPsM-0006ci-Bb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:20:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:49172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxPsM-0006bl-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:20:54 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p29KKiGv024527; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:20:45 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C0BF16615E; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:21:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87lj0oyfar.fsf@speer.lan> (Lute Kamstra's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:32:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3735=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136991 Archived-At: >>> If not, what would be the best way to remedy the situation? >> Don't use vc-do-command and use process-file or >> start-file-process directly. > That way, I would have to duplicate a considerable amount of the > functionality of vc-do-command. Another option is to pass nil for the file-or-list argument. > What about adding a more versatile version of vc-do-command that > accepts after-flags as well as before-flags and implement the current > vc-do-command using that? I could implement it and send in a patch. That could work as well. Stefan