From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Extra info about 109170 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50098373.6080505@yandex.ru> <83txx17cnp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342951053 31978 80.91.229.3 (22 Jul 2012 09:57:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 09:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 11:57:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sssun-000366-Pw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:57:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40767 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sssun-0004og-1h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sssuj-0004oF-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sssui-0001S7-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:55738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sssui-0001Rv-5y; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:24 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6M9vLun027510; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B06F8AE17C; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:57:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83txx17cnp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:15:38 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4286=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4286> : streams <788663> : uri <1171820> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151798 Archived-At: > I'd appreciate if someone could explain why are we excited about 8% > speedup, and on top of that in massive byte-compiling (something that > can hardly be described as a frequent operation). 8% speedup in an actual run of Emacs is a pretty good speed up for such a small change. Stefan