From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-24 d69e9f1: CC Mode: Stop Font Lock forcing fontification from BOL. Fixes debbugs#19669. Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:29:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20150201212213.17840.3710@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20150202213957.GF3673@acm.acm> <20150207122711.GA3772@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423323011 7117 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 15:30:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 16:30:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7Kf-00067S-HB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:30:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7Ke-0002J3-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7Kb-0002Ij-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7KW-0006OF-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:30:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:58412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7KW-0006O9-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:29:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t17FTsM8001000; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:29:54 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 54645FAA; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:29:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20150207122711.GA3772@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:27:11 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5210=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5210> : inlines <2048> : streams <1386314> : uri <1849072> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182612 Archived-At: >> What would be "the closest syntactically safe" position before 409? > In the sense meant, 409 is the earliest "syntactically safe" position, > since (char-before 409) is "{" So, even point-min wouldn't be safe? Stefan