From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:39:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <642fd4b4-8b1c-a537-5a5f-6940691ec4b9@gmail.com> <48fddde1-7dd9-f640-0171-ea3cecc09670@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475941247 28323 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2016 15:40:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 17:40:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bstjf-0004oI-1i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:40:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41528 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bstjg-0006ZD-Nk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bstjb-0006Z1-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bstjV-0003aG-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42485 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bstjV-0003Xc-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bstj9-0001Hc-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 17:39:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z5Ty2eUS5eUi0jWSDDckbWl0CyQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208103 Archived-At: > Why is it that nobody mentions Racket when talking about lisp or scheme? I guess because we still need to run existing Elisp. The assumption being that Guile can run existing Elisp, and that it wouldn't be too hard to make an existing Common-Lisp system run existing Elisp as well. Stefan