From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:46:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <075B0922-F07A-4FBA-AE71-027E964A5ED4@raeburn.org> <54AAC13A-CF56-4393-A932-DC6CBBF51259@raeburn.org> <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <83pokyeale.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8blziva.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482681019 21644 195.159.176.226 (25 Dec 2016 15:50:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:50:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 25 16:50:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB3v-00052n-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:50:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB40-0000kt-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB3u-0000ko-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB3r-0000ef-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=60931 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB3q-0000eZ-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 10:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLB3k-0003vc-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 16:50:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:fk0dJoReUXxTP7G4zg/DVG5AMTI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210804 Archived-At: > I took a quick look. There are a few issues with the Windows build > there, but I have one question to which I'd like to know the answer > first: why do we still dumping temacs to emacs, instead of loading > dumped.elc into a bare emacs? I don't know if Ken has another reason, but in my case it's simply because I haven't bothered to change the code so as not to call the unexec dump. Stefan