From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: Adding BBDB to Emacs core Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:57:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lgdpphmm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sh7mjd7d.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87lgddgaga.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87bme8b7u9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <65ee99c7-6c45-e477-d34b-8efb1aa4712d@cs.ucla.edu> <87in8f8wuw.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87po2nz1rr.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1524675653 20715 195.159.176.226 (25 Apr 2018 17:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:00:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 25 19:00:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNmi-0005Jy-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:00:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNop-0006DN-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNoD-0006D6-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNoA-00009j-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:02:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51043 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNoA-000098-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fBNm0-0004e1-Vs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 19:00:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:3EElpuxSmJNZDoTshkMP5yqK1kk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224881 Archived-At: > How would that be generated? I mean, it would be based on the packages > that are already there? Yes. > I think that this would make generating ELPA from a git clone would > not work, It would work, but it would only give you the latest versions, indeed. I don't see a problem with that: how many people/places do you know who build an ELPA archive from the elpa.git repository? Stefan