From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 09:06:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8336ldd49j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r28xbhv1.fsf@gnu.org> <83h89tb95n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="166840"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 15:10:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcdF-000hDn-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:10:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcdE-0006Yu-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRccf-0006Yd-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRcce-00042N-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51578 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRccd-00040v-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 09:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRccc-000gUZ-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 15:10:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:IC2ybTEJZuWIgauw++uP84YxgIE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236667 Archived-At: > We have something like a policy, but AFAIR this case is special: we > obsolete a user command on the premises that it is no longer used, and > don't provide any replacement. Which is why I think obsolete/ might > be a better place for it. I think in cases where we think there might still be occasional users, lisp/obsolete files can be moved to GNU ELPA. Stefan