From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about display engine Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190807005411.qfzzpz5cjrajbwn2@Ergus> <83o911aukn.fsf@gnu.org> <20190807153220.ssijgjxnf6dszz45@Ergus> <83k1bpasic.fsf@gnu.org> <20190807155738.yviofsumjjhqueci@Ergus> <83imr9ar9f.fsf@gnu.org> <0975890b-37b4-428d-f6e5-5dcf894fb6be@gmx.at> <83ftmdapxm.fsf@gnu.org> <20190808083804.ta3evocyb4hirywj@Ergus> <83wofna785.fsf@gnu.org> <83h86p8dov.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="178809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: martin rudalics , spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 11 01:04:29 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hwaPT-000kND-4e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Aug 2019 01:04:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwaPS-0001We-6Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hwaPN-0001WL-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hwaPN-0005Ca-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:57523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hwaPL-0005AZ-Ga; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 473331032D1; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CDE5A103256; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1565478256; bh=oxlDNi4I56P94wRaeSdUudXjVmdEJj4CkEiqw9J6ZPE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lV2I76WhBl+G91i2g1YKBD5gWbL61g9+OFMY7FQCL+HFNWmRvh7yMuB9ib53enhtN mDa4XkmAG46+qatXHoH+YvnueeyP/zww385TP/EgNG/ipoZAlV4vb3G5uDZbQS9t8G EPQdvdFUwKpFC2LocoJyktk/RQ6NVO55B1aN/Q5fH+59x7jfgswzpYJp+bKSfTqUzo gcK0EJ+qY4y0TiO5a0MWN4VaWNlZdFsXwpNnSmKyW8apVAVkXwIAh6eixuJcI9Q5em bc6ZsWJIYH8Nll98FjxUwKijNbZMj60MY87PFjyBLTeGeexkohCBO08bI3yiO96eNw hZoCwNRE/JwVg== Original-Received: from alfajor (dyn.83-228-179-131.dsl.vtx.ch [83.228.179.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8F62120325; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 19:04:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83h86p8dov.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Aug 2019 14:25:36 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239315 Archived-At: > IOW, the problem with the attribute-level idea is that it will affect > those attributes regardless of the face from which they came. Per-face indeed sounds like a better option than per-attribute. Furthermore, it should be much easier to add it in a clean way to the current system. Of course per-face per-attribute would be even more flexible, but I'm not completely convinced it's worth the trouble. Stefan