From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: resize_mini_window question Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200918150113.4vz5vq3krfslrwdz.ref@Ergus> <20200918150113.4vz5vq3krfslrwdz@Ergus> <20200918155638.bvak6p3ewdqjmdgj@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27748"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 18 18:16:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJ3o-00074l-6T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:16:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJJ3n-0001jA-2E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:16:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIqI-0000Cl-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:9650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJIqD-0001rZ-Aa; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0C5A1002FA; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1BFBC100222; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1600444935; bh=Ug9kVCngp0OFlyXwc7REquIGO9ApHj2ea4Be6plZ5lM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=H/h5Sxlf9lJM4J7AMuW16aNaV4gSedh85Ob8gbpUjiCoenXA5y9fvDAC+EwpJ0eOc ZK0onpEog3oCIlc+HNw4INHf0mZjBmNP9mbTJ0WN0kxq2gNtyNPgEne/ACz7vfYb74 7/+hg9k4h7HB2e+Zi28ZPgFdvQ5M1vWQ2kr2jhIjHDWtMxkvMs3f7q9YnP2m+cWVwp keZolaPWiEK/ry58/fYZu8tHewYXnUEIRDQcaC7qXUnPpysHMwyW0PbtVzp2I/YbDG uYitpoQaGMvBZOoMo2SCD4KcBFbEBafSeZApw30Z9nzoqy80DCa2WORU3n9Z128saI e+u7LwcSUiBIA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E225712055F; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:02:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20200918155638.bvak6p3ewdqjmdgj@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:56:38 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/18 11:15:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256111 Archived-At: > Yes I know. The problem with this was that in my case the user could be > expecting to see as many lines as specified in max-mini-window-height as > an integer. I think that is simply a problem of wrong expectations, which we could somewhat fix by tweaking the documentation like you suggested. > The external package used to force an enlarge-window but I feel that > this is somehow a workaround. Indeed. I think it's important to find a solution to the "disappearing prompt" that doesn't involve this since enlarging the window is not always an option either. Stefan