From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus-group-read-ephemeral-search-group -- Something Changed? Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2020 01:33:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20201106162239.1E8ECC20DCB@raman-glaptop.localdomain> <87wnyy5rkh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k0uy5oe6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sg9l4tp4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38540"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 07 07:34:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kbHnW-0009vB-Ux for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 07:34:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36530 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbHnW-0002S4-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 01:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbHmw-0001zo-MC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 01:33:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:28820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kbHmr-00062x-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2020 01:33:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4AD0F8091C; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:33:19 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B859580159; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:33:13 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1604730793; bh=J5/+5uxR1VpR8K7VHCERNM2LRQLqR+ikRiRUHiof/mA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Amf+cE+XSYf1A//ntv3uCt938y5Ni0wLg7kFwPd7i73dUxF0oQMNmIhDOyJPG+hXJ 0YBWtL/j9vVkRNYnstSCoDSxM4t8AOVpTNz6/HAJDXLrUelOdzBRW/fRQbHPuJe+nQ U1yijjukDm+0GMs4ayZhkXP5O37Kd68PxPpBlNc7XCrN38IXnCo4cq3POVn1YcDAZL ZBb7i/Sk+USMZbOp4QUR0yFZW1pCYZkpXiMXvF5xhw3+pauzli3rtkdQKya66CgwQp Jwp2p4G5g0HmT7Gd0e03fzyyoOgJ+Z1zZdsqrBuKBs1fiiuHyT9EeAvSkRM8BjaWnf VGfvXIQGrqPYg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89885120308; Sat, 7 Nov 2020 01:33:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87sg9l4tp4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2020 21:33:27 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/07 01:33:19 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258867 Archived-At: > There are downsides to being an early adopter (the earliest)! Hopefully > sailing will be smoother here on out. I'm talking about things I don't know, but seeing this exchange from the back of the room gives me the impression that maybe gnus-search should try and signal a more user-friendly error in his case rather than expose a "no applicable method" that doesn't seem immediately related to his settings. Stefan