From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question: add-face-text-property for 'font-lock-face? Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83a6l0n32e.fsf@gnu.org> <3272782D-2308-447C-B94B-A65E561C4D18@MIT.EDU> <835yvon11g.fsf@gnu.org> <5cf80cca-828a-614c-9cb4-d478a04c05f5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31806"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "cpitclaudel@gmail.com" , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs Devel To: Qiantan Hong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 01:48:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUX6-00084Y-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:48:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUX5-0000HB-A1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUWK-00080v-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:46644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUWI-0004C2-3T; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CBBDB80A79; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 79995803CA; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1630280838; bh=cUXr9154poyQ/nioQObUTlJ1lS5Ymg3YNm6MCFK5gwk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LVPAXCYthDp4+GBBrNKpe5JgpeHkKgKHuA/DttzCiYcBO/Zq07BdiyMsfUwwKhXdm 3ogcMqHw95uf0H3c2OsUmCIzBnusmceRpdbMYO2wJpylYHDll2CAAjSherX4qvVo02 eEFWcyx1Ju06KmnBkuJhYo0DUfTWevGenwmDcsxS7qpK0C+TMmJoC4PUKhaWMyqgdW yodvEiRzvBQWSAffEq4Re+zjwqQysPoAp3MPgZUUgGRQrk7npBIL9PXixe1FoMvJGR mi5mAOTYhlSE+EHzSumw2/4er1tNw6JxJn8a48Gs0vJLK2q1uCZ8tADPMlx3rXRZjh F0VgcBgqRpjhg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E5911202FA; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:47:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Qiantan Hong's message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2021 21:13:11 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273443 Archived-At: > I now see that Yuan=E2=80=99s suggestion of overlay will do this, but the= re=E2=80=99s > performance concern. The performance concern is largely hypothetical, and if it ever proves real, we have a branch waiting to be merged that reimplement overlays in a more efficient (algorithmically) way. Stefan