From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not using DOC for ELisp files Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 06:11:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n24le-0001ij-E9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 06:11:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n24ld-00076h-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:11:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n24kd-0006KS-63 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41640) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n24ka-0008Iz-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4CAF5440288; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 497EA440059; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:11 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1640668211; bh=30QS6jvwL1bmk3LWZECNrPpS3NDK1bBTVD4FSyR74MM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=OrEllWWAc7X94+FBrP5AYaRrwZT/lnroax+z9tWqv0G9mWu8DRd4/3XcxYL75tS23 o4bVVj6Tf8W2VWZK84u6jsTBT5xP9IvAa8Hqz81nBheNFhTbUMVVhzMCS5pmnt4OWu 5gH119FpNz9RXhxVUK8viO3/SaD4MobjDS+KgWLOreuPoyDzlkbjEtpAoTGg4k++FH 3uBDcnpmAXYs7DygYvsjtCiR9XkB3Q/mbHlnJlZmM4ReED8u9MBt0yizXmWWVz6gn+ aG459pOnJGq8fWjZOuIwj3/M8IWofRyv90Hbz+He7ugNKOsnsg4mmCPJ/atiOJgy7m /cVxsFN+2jp4A== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BB61120249; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:10:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Mon, 27 Dec 2021 19:39:15 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283480 Archived-At: >> I have a vague recollection that such a change was mentioned in some >> bugreport-discussion some months ago but I can't remember where. > Bug#27748, maybe? That's the one, thanks. > What about the comment about DOC in bytecomp.el? Should that be removed > as well? Maybe not removed, but yes, I should adjust it accordingly. Stefan