From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speeding up the bootstrap build - a quick hack. Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83pmopunzl.fsf@gnu.org> <83y23cu9bl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8549"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 21:30:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n9v7s-0001yt-I2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:30:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44024 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9v7r-0007hH-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9v5j-0005Rx-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:59718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9v5e-0001dM-M6; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:31 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6AE6944254E; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21A9C44253F; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642537699; bh=zQ+7Y/rSf+J6x8we+Xd+zfOKyVXvxJU7viqDOVL8MxQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Lj8ZHrKER+MaG4wNWEYIXYVUxcG6RJgkF28hYup4capIEXIkgCmreMVQyv4W71ezU 8YKpIXvzpLEkcJKvsh9e36JcF9qi7HEwrDxWo8IRZt8ss+BeyRCBiHwD/o1EceaFoM UzlxJKyJZkyWumSLAIH45KGSFOUjs8lBMnMA2upfXxoaBJ59pUD4fUtbzrRAEI4uVh gJbqhdRYJVoH1HJaPQ4F8YVSMt0SHfrf8USZnM8la5tlzCEMiHvSPLyoR59OhHlcJn AzkEFC22NHBcRCxqzPYpuhnpM/oYuYubCajS7Y3pLnmknx8weAJJ/5JSpgozjU85Dj WORqqqJuHI1Vg== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E85CE120913; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:28:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83y23cu9bl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:34:38 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284949 Archived-At: > What I had in mind is to run the last "$(MAKE) -C ../lisp compile-first" > line so that it binds no-native-compile to non-nil, and then is to run > it again without binding that variable, after touch'ing the corresponding > *.el files to force the recompile. That could work as well, but `touch`ing the `.el` files is an ugly hack that's also annoying when you're editing those files (Emacs then asks you whether you really want to overwrite them, etc...). I guess we could `touch` the .elc instead (to mark them as older), tho. I don't personally care which hack we use, and don't find one to be noticeably cleaner than the other. Stefan