From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Distinguishing `consp` and `functionp` Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3fbf532f-9e79-40ea-aff0-172af5ca8f20@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1350"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 01:25:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rTA1o-00008Y-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:25:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTA1G-0006OO-AY; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTA1E-0006O6-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rTA1C-0004HG-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:28 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 679AD100068; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1706228663; bh=Fs6SdB3SN4Y0wi5w6lFgpx4rmmzSwI4l/r/sQmyFLxI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GNiAtRZbMAZ/9kV8dMogPhSsKyuflffk93QrDtJEnINP9bScRWumMK4BhANPwVZ0i ew6Jc594lRVaU4uDuifSf3mqyIofXAcF1T6kfbOt+LeY8Z/6m6pKpmlZkS9T10RN0e mExLGr1rjjlbNiAJqJXY72as22pC6ad3UHHvP8YbICqKro/r2jgEWx1hZ3Bs2zfnf2 JvNYs2eQh8ijy9/M06LbpcpurjZmceeWGaAbo6MJ1TsiuRcilWgGoxvkkHFZGsZsGO c5dqLNy73eLhXMWHcvIFcy6faYFRdP13z8lpEoESRnW6cfUd60LITleM3H2gTnq/zU ut6rmq1/ciTag== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F52310004C; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.206.68]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 195B8120426; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 19:24:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3fbf532f-9e79-40ea-aff0-172af5ca8f20@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Thu, 25 Jan 2024 18:00:29 -0600") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315397 Archived-At: >> It's got several rough edges (most importantly that >> `byte-code-function-p` returns non-nil for interpreted function values), >> but it seems to work OK so far. > > Forgive me if this is noise (i.e. if that is already intended to be fixed): > If that were not fixed, it would break a few things in non-core packages > that I'm aware of. Yes, clearly it can't fly without fixing that first :-) Stefan