From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w3 mode Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:03:02 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <54is9mft7y.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097168635 19565 80.91.229.6 (7 Oct 2004 17:03:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 19:03:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFbgC-0005M5-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:03:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFbmx-0000Zi-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CFbmQ-0000Ku-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CFbmP-0000KU-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFbmP-0000KE-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CFbfW-0006DF-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F287F82828D; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:03:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24A74AC05E; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:03:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4F5248CA23; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:03:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Camm Maguire In-Reply-To: <54is9mft7y.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> (Camm Maguire's message of "07 Oct 2004 11:22:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28043 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28043 > Greetings! Before getting into the details, I notice in general that > w3 mode works much better in xemacs. Is this generally known, or do I > have a problem in my local setup? IIRC W3 was developed on XEmacs (Emacs didn't have image support at that time), so it's no surprise it works better there, especially since there hasn't been much work put into W3 development recently (e.g. since Emacs provides support for images). Stefan