From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [davidsmith@acm.org: [patch] url-hexify-string does not follow W3C spec] Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:50:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <44CDDF7A.8060404@gnu.org> <87lkq9ivgf.fsf@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154415083 12524 80.91.229.2 (1 Aug 2006 06:51:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 08:51:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7o5f-0004iB-CS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:50:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7o5e-0002iu-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7o5S-0002gq-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:50:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G7o5Q-0002eL-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:50:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7o5Q-0002dx-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G7o8F-0004ev-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.146.253]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060801065039.XDQL10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 98F427ED3; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:50:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu In-Reply-To: (YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu's message of "Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:34:45 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57918 Archived-At: >> What incompatibility? If the string only contains ASCII and >> eight-bit-*, then encoding it with utf-8 will return the same string >> of bytes (except in a unibyte string rather than multibyte string). > Here's an example: > (encode-coding-string "\x80" 'utf-8) > => "\302\200" Duh! Looks like a serious bug to me. Handa-san, what's up with that? Stefan