From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Strange emacsclient behaviour during use of isearch Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:50:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7f9b11c90703101224n50b16955pe853c81979dd4f51@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174449070 20163 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2007 03:51:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Richard Stallman , Emacs-Devel To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 21 04:51:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HTrqn-0003eg-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:51:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTrsQ-0007OP-6V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTrsM-0007Nk-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HTrsL-0007NX-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:52:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTrsK-0007NT-Vk; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.188]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HTrqg-0007BG-Ed; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([70.55.81.12]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070321035053.ZLME1521.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@ceviche.home>; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5DC0CB4FD8; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:50:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue\, 20 Mar 2007 17\:30\:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68193 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:17680 Archived-At: > We've done another pretest and this issue is still undecided. > After researching the problem, Stefan said: >> [...] if I remove the `isearch-mode' check, the buffer is indeed displayed. >> The problem is that since it doesn't exit isearch, you end up isearching in >> the new buffer. > which seems like an argument for aborting the isearch (or an argument for > rethinking isearch, but I don't think we want to do that right now). > One way or the other, we should reach a decision and fix the bug. Yes, I think aborting the isearch is the best choice. I wish we could do it more prettily than with the code you showed, but I think we'll have to live with it for now. Stefan