From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Your Emacs changes Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:58:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <46CAF9CC.6030308@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187715655 28364 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2007 17:00:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 21 19:00:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1INX5u-0007q8-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:00:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INX5u-0005Kb-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INX5q-0005HO-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INX5p-0005Ex-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INX5o-0005Ee-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts25.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.188] helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1INX5o-0004M2-Ez; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([65.94.183.199]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070821170031.IWMP19497.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@ceviche.home>; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 712C270039; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:58:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <46CAF9CC.6030308@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Tue\, 21 Aug 2007 18\:42\:20 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76901 Archived-At: > Note the same optimization may be performed on sweeping floats. But, > since an amount of allocated floats is too small in comparison with > conses, an effect is expected to be very negligible. Ideally, we should share the code, so even tho the effect is usually small, it would be worth it since it wouldn't cost any extra maintenance burden. Stefan