From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:21:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv4omzhtnh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83637fccsz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:23:40 +0200")
>> 39 minutes for branching outside the shared repository corresponds to a
>> slow machine. It is 10 minutes on a GNU/Linux 2.4 GHz 64 bits
>> worksation-class machine.
> I don't think the time it takes to make the original branch (or a
> branch outside the shared repo) is CPU-bound. It took me 50 minutes
> on a 3GHz Windows machine with a single hyperthreaded core, and the
> CPU time used by bzr never went up to more than 25%.
It's both CPU and IO bound, last I tried.
It's just not very efficient.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-03 17:47 Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? Alan Mackenzie
2010-01-03 17:59 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-06 13:10 ` Alan Mackenzie
2010-01-06 13:28 ` Jason Rumney
2010-01-06 14:06 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-06 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-06 20:21 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2010-01-07 7:44 ` Yavor Doganov
2010-01-07 8:37 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-07 9:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-01-07 19:18 ` Stephen Berman
2010-01-07 19:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-07 20:09 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-07 21:48 ` Jason Earl
2010-01-07 23:48 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-08 2:07 ` Jason Earl
2010-01-08 7:10 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-08 8:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-07 14:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-07 17:05 ` Yavor Doganov
2010-01-07 19:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-07 19:46 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-07 20:26 ` Thrashing [was: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?] Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-07 20:20 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-07 13:40 ` Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? [was: branch] Alan Mackenzie
2010-01-07 13:56 ` Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-07 14:03 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-01-07 15:18 ` Jan Djärv
2010-01-07 14:52 ` Alan Mackenzie
2010-01-07 15:00 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-01-07 15:17 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-07 17:51 ` Glenn Morris
2010-01-07 20:48 ` Karl Fogel
2010-01-07 21:21 ` Glenn Morris
2010-01-08 8:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-01-07 15:17 ` Óscar Fuentes
2010-01-07 17:54 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-01-07 15:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-01-06 14:37 ` Surely 'bzr branch' " Stefan Monnier
2010-01-07 5:00 ` Karl Fogel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv4omzhtnh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ofv@wanadoo.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).