From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr send workflow Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:05:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87occvzosg.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282428371 17286 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2010 22:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bojan Nikolic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 00:06:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmwCM-0002vQ-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:06:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51914 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmwCG-0004Hd-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:05:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46913 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmwC5-0004GS-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmwC1-0006GQ-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:05:38 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm3.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.3]:38696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmwC1-0006GD-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost5.adm.correo ([10.20.102.126]) by IMPaqm3.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id xA5T1e0222jdgqJ3PA5bG1; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:05:35 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.61.35.93]) by IMPmailhost5.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id xA5a1e00120aCvn1lA5a4N; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:05:35 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E7D7E660E9; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 00:05:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87occvzosg.fsf@bnikolic.co.uk> (Bojan Nikolic's message of "Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:36:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128999 Archived-At: > Since maybe I missed the discussion on this, I just wanted to ask if > this workflow has been considered and rejected? If not, I'd be happy to > offer a more detailed summary of how it works and the advantages. Before we can switch to such a system, we need to get rid of the ChangeLog files (which are otherwise a constant source of spurious conflicts which make such a workflow impractical). I haven't dared to enter this discussion yet. Stefan