From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwxk7wub.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355322433 25351 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2012 14:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 15:27:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TinHP-0007rZ-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:27:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52618 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TinHC-0002hc-3u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TinH0-0002Su-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TinGu-00061a-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:58 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TinGu-00061R-Bl; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:52 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qBCEQsnq005624; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:54 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3C512B415D; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83mwxk7wub.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:50:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4430=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4430> : streams <873207> : uri <1291982> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155511 Archived-At: >> Could it be that when you compiled the files, you used an `emacs' that >> was dumped from .elc files, whereas when you bootstrap, you compile the >> files with an `emacs' that was dumped from .el files? > Yes, but that can only explain a 25% increase in time. Where do you get that 25% from? Stefan