From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git version of ELPA Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8738qs5qrg.fsf@igel.home> <87mwoz4w4f.fsf@igel.home> <877gfrrida.fsf@yandex.ru> <52087DDD.1020100@yandex.ru> <52090C0F.4020508@yandex.ru> <520B4B29.8030201@yandex.ru> <520BB4FA.4080903@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376506940 28103 80.91.229.3 (14 Aug 2013 19:02:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 14 21:02:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V9gKq-0005dx-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:02:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9gKq-0000Ja-6V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9gKg-0000JM-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9gKZ-0004ZJ-AQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:43189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9gKZ-0004ZE-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r7EJ22gD032379; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 60128B420C; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:02:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <520BB4FA.4080903@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 14 Aug 2013 19:48:58 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4670=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4670> : streams <1019593> : uri <1506651> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162737 Archived-At: >>> 2) If packages/js2-mode and git@github.com:mooz/js2-mode.git differ >>> in files they contain, I imagine we'll have more errors or conflicts >>> to deal with. >> Yes and no: the "push" would simply force the github version to have >> the same content as the elpa version. > The push just after the removal commit would end up fine. No, by definition "push" gives you an exact copy at the other end. >> Yes. The elpa-diffs email as well (a copy is sent to the maintainer). > Never seen that working before. Is that a recent change? Fairly recent, yes. Of course, now it's broken again by the change to Git. >>>> Currently, you can have extra (ignored) files only for singlefile >>>> packages. Multifile packages will package up whatever is present. >>>> But it should be easy to add some way to list files that should be >>>> skipped. IOW, same as above "patch is welcome, tho you might like to >>>> wait a bit". >>> I'd welcome a suggestion for the exact mechanism. >> A simple solution is to not remove those files from the `elpa' branch. >> I.e. consider it as a "local change". It might lead to spurious >> conflicts when merging, tho. > Not sure I understand. I didn't suggest removing them. > What changes, and "local" to what? Changes, as in "file removal", "file renaming", ... Local to the `elpa' version. > If you mean the file listing the ignores, I'm sure it'll be fine to keep it > in the upstream repo, too. Maybe Melpa even ends up using them, too. No, I mean not have any listing at all. Just remove from the `elpa' branch the files you don't want to see in the packages. > Exclusions are fine by me, too. So, file name ".elpaignore", syntax similar > to ".gitignore" (one glob per line)? Syntax: whatever "tar" accepts. Stefan