From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GC and stack marking Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sio2nb4s.fsf@gnu.org> <83r43mmt25.fsf@gnu.org> <537D6B2D.90208@dancol.org> <87vbsy8jc8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400767072 2606 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2014 13:57:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 15:57:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WnTVB-00071l-CH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 15:57:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnTVA-0006Bx-Ua for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnTUo-0005cw-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnTUg-00076k-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnTUf-00076H-Rj; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s4MDvBvx009683; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 94AC6AE0D2; Thu, 22 May 2014 09:57:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87vbsy8jc8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 07:37:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4950=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4950> : inlines <914> : streams <1190411> : uri <1764289> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172022 Archived-At: > How about explicitly triggering garbage collection at a point of time > where the water mark is really low? We already do that. Stefan