tpu-edt.el

tpu-edt.el

[PASZTOR Miklos]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 562 bytes --]

 Hello,

 NEWS in the latest emacs distribution reads:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| *** tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el
| These emulations of old editors are believed to be no longer relevant
|  - contact emacs-devel@gnu.org if you disagree.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 I am a heavy tpu-edt.el user. TPU emulation was one of the main reasons I
 started to use emacs more than 20 years ago.

 Please do not remove tpu-edt.el.

 Thanks,
 Miklós
--

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

Re: tpu-edt.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>  I am a heavy tpu-edt.el user. TPU emulation was one of the main reasons I
>  started to use emacs more than 20 years ago.
>  Please do not remove tpu-edt.el.

Then we should move it to GNU ELPA, like we did for crisp-mode.


        Stefan

Re: tpu-edt.el

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

 >>> *** tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

 >>> These emulations of old editors are believed to be no longer
 >>> relevant

 >> I am a heavy tpu-edt.el user. TPU emulation was one of the main
 >> reasons I started to use emacs more than 20 years ago.  Please do
 >> not remove tpu-edt.el.

 > Then we should move it to GNU ELPA, like we did for crisp-mode.

	Given that there’s a brand new (and non-free) WordStar clone,
	I tend to think that ws-mode.el is also to be saved.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A

Re: tpu-edt.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Then we should move it to GNU ELPA, like we did for crisp-mode.
> 	Given that there’s a brand new (and non-free) WordStar clone,
> 	I tend to think that ws-mode.el is also to be saved.

Sounds good.  

>       And of course I volunteer to take care of them.

Oh, thanks, that's really appreciated,


        Stefan

tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

 >>> Then we should move it to GNU ELPA, like we did for crisp-mode.

 >> Given that there’s a brand new (and non-free) WordStar clone, I tend
 >> to think that ws-mode.el is also to be saved.

 > Sounds good.

 >> And of course I volunteer to take care of them.

 > Oh, thanks, that's really appreciated,

	I truly didn’t expect that from myself.

	What kind of care would ws-mode.el require, anyway?

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  Separate ways — Mathieu Berthaud … B6A0 230E 334A

Re: tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> And of course I volunteer to take care of them.
>> Oh, thanks, that's really appreciated,
> 	I truly didn’t expect that from myself.

You literally outdid yourself, indeed.

> 	What kind of care would ws-mode.el require, anyway?

Just moving it to elpa.git, basically.


        Stefan

Re: tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

[…]

 >> What kind of care would ws-mode.el require, anyway?

 > Just moving it to elpa.git, basically.

	Which, AIUI, means adjusting the comments and then just
	committing it there?

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A

Re: tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Stefan Monnier]

> 	Which, AIUI, means adjusting the comments and then just
> 	committing it there?

Adding a Version and yes, that's pretty much it,


        Stefan

Re: tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Ivan Shmakov]

>>>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

 >> Which, AIUI, means adjusting the comments and then just committing
 >> it there?

 > Adding a Version and yes, that's pretty much it,

	Except that both happen to have one.  I presume I’d have to bump
	Version: instead should – there be any changes to the file on
	‘master’, and also remove Obsolete-since:?

-- 
FSF associate member #7257  http://boycottsystemd.org/  … 3013 B6A0 230E 334A

Re: tpu-edt.el, ws-mode.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> Which, AIUI, means adjusting the comments and then just committing
>>> it there?
>> Adding a Version and yes, that's pretty much it,
> 	Except that both happen to have one.  I presume I’d have to bump
> 	Version: instead should – there be any changes to the file on
> 	‘master’, and also remove Obsolete-since:?

If the two files are identical (codewise), then we should use the same
version number.


        Stefan