From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sub and superscripts: without =?windows-1252?B?q1+7?= and =?windows-1252?B?q167?= Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:20:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877fo8dbep.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441225256 18193 80.91.229.3 (2 Sep 2015 20:20:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 20:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 02 22:20:41 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXEWP-00024p-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 22:20:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXEWP-0000Hw-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:20:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXEWF-0000Gh-Q5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXEWC-0000py-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:63684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXEWC-0000pu-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:20:28 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AzFgA731xV//rn92hcgxCEAoVVu0CHSwQCAoE8OxIBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNExGINwjPIwEBAQcCAR+LOoUFB4QtBap7igkjhBQigngBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AzFgA731xV//rn92hcgxCEAoVVu0CHSwQCAoE8OxIBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEDAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNExGINwjPIwEBAQcCAR+LOoUFB4QtBap7igkjhBQigngBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="162226509" Original-Received: from 104-247-231-250.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([104.247.231.250]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2015 16:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 39DCC62323; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:20:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877fo8dbep.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:38:22 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189485 Archived-At: > I asked this on auctex-dev but it might be question concerning core > functionality of GNU emacs: The necessary core functionality has been present for a long time: just add the proper `invisible' property to the chars you don't want to see. > Are there any plans to implement such a feature? Where? In tex-mode's font-lock rules? No, I tend to think of it as a misfeature (prettification vs WYSIWYG-ification). Stefan