From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:45:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <10c96362-297f-db97-d4a9-da3d66d4dd34@cs.ucla.edu> <83in974gwf.fsf@gnu.org> <83zi2j2hp4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522961071 27775 195.159.176.226 (5 Apr 2018 20:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:44:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 05 22:44:27 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BkA-00076z-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 22:44:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BmG-0004Ym-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BlY-0004YS-F6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BlU-0003s1-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:45:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37411 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BlU-0003po-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 16:45:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4BjM-000668-Nn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 22:43:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:0Gx4B52mxnLbiTgiiUwZAR9zxnQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224373 Archived-At: > The frame-fitting code moves point through the buffer, > at eol (`end-of-line'), within a `save-excursion', to > get the longest line length. That movement presumably > means that fonts are looked for to render the chars in > each line. The movement doesn't care about the chars themselves (it's just looking for an end-of-line). So it's probably the computation of the line-length which triggers it. You can probably avoid the problem by using another way to compute the "length" (one which doesn't care about fonts). Stefan