From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bignum branch Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:19:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87o9fbbw1t.fsf@tromey.com> <86in5jdj49.fsf@gmail.com> <83wotxaiwi.fsf@gnu.org> <86k1pxmvmx.fsf@gmail.com> <87efg4a9xc.fsf@tromey.com> <83d0voa6fw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1531743481 7940 195.159.176.226 (16 Jul 2018 12:18:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:18:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 16 14:17:57 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2Rv-0001w2-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:17:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51009 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2U2-0006Wk-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2TM-0006WT-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2TH-0007fK-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33326 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2TG-0007ey-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ff2R4-0000yc-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 14:17:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:HiN6025u8GPDZRR32XhJgPWa/Uw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227447 Archived-At: > Yes, we need such wrappers in those cases. Another use case is a > 32-bit build --with-wide-int. Tho, eventually, bignums should make --with-wide-int redundant. Stefan