From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VOTE: Changing completions-common-part face's default Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:19:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4c5631d4-9dfd-04c6-c573-b83c67fcc2fa@yandex.ru> <87pni7p83l.fsf@gmail.com> <87h83ipoi0.fsf@gmail.com> <93235eb5-8e04-7182-e2a4-49fbe610ee2b@yandex.ru> <28d4ae09-daca-324b-2fa6-9d7138d710fa@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="38200"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 20:21:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT9oe-0009kx-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 20:21:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT9oc-0005Bt-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT9mw-00059C-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:19:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iT9mu-000290-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iT9mu-00028f-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B5274449A0F; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:19:15 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72872442B88; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:19:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1573240754; bh=/B3MZAP3tq64oErRNfDJovMywoG2old7YPGCFIfChm0=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=W6rGooTgI1I67+1q+Nx96Aei/LCoGpVZNXY2n/OSMroYp08Qvg9/kd7ZQCI9vjPNK qJHkVm2HbfmsjkJRx+KsubzJ4zQoQ5N92e6H7VgG9PoL+rfqbHChGB0SzyTufDzHyr 6QbI7+yajiaJD6Icq04feTYYESXtlmvWfm2txAneZy/OmII5PgGS2QHMCxgLx1xNLo gwOPvSuY0pnSjBsXbyBK+ypybPSM3DYaiAXKa669R52cCj/yGycfu0cOIwUlr8kERG egc6BITfdGY3BVebBdaad/ht3B3n4bbRerJpYNnlDiLpsozqInkwTTPfJH41CNa/y5 NQczaBnJpnLjA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.47.134]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 077AB120A5A; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:19:14 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:15:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241999 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > blue3 is a good enough color, and it fits the default theme. So unless we > can agree on a better idea, and unless other people object, let's go with > blue3 and call it a day. OK, we have one vote here, great. Jo=E3o, you also mentioned some objections to "blue3", do they still stand, or are you willing to settle for "blue3" now? Eli? I suspect there will be more reactions once(if?) we actually install the change, so it'd be good to install this soon so we have time to tweak/revert it before the release. > If we have more time to think on this, Of course, we can change it again later, so there will definitely be more time to think about it. But I'd like more people to be exposed to it so opinions are based on more concrete experience (e.g. I was quite convinced at first that I'd be OK with "common=3Dbold firstdiff=3Dunderline" and it's only after some days of use that I realized that I really didn't like the "firstdiff=3Dunderline" part). Stefan