From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA: where is chess developed? Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mu87ji39.fsf@dick> <87v9mvp2ms.fsf@blind.guru> <87d093f6lj.fsf@dick> <87369yc79r.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="119290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mario Lang , Jack Hill , dick.r.chiang@gmail.com, Emacs developers To: Philippe Vaucher Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 15:41:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkkc-000UxG-RS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:41:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkkb-0002wm-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkk6-0002TB-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkk4-0000SI-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jGkk4-0000Q6-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACF1F44F5C5; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3F12044EA27; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585060878; bh=RSuI6QCPuABxzVR/OqtrlILL87o+cgP3WuceNbSn93M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PSeCBB54n8K+VUIf0ERyBKBMzkx6Ixrj/enGQkWE/RA3I7Uueea2B6WTdYeh8aBUh 7dAMU24RSEflPVbkCxF/VcE6GPX03ZDgAelmvjcE3/VYlGMVNVfo7rx1hlZ4GtUb8r L3WpDZo75LgRcF14rhhbE/NJMxmTBUo4twiQbrhJPZ4LK+MtJHbeEcWCwwPmEPURI/ c4aaA/u1QcOE8XdYCbnzm9MkV5/bvvkHzGRUO9TqJhOTCUHzZa80yI3c8uQIH1XxRo +/jBLttDr5ZJCtssYqOYJlsJ/IVHDOCcU3wTI/wZk+SszZNBkDGrp+DPkGf1N58pIR GIXGEhvq7lPsg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD53F120230; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:41:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:12:42 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245761 Archived-At: >> Question for maintainers: is it actually mandatory that all changes are >> submitted through patches on the ML? If we need to submit lot of >> patches, can we just point to an external repository on some branch? > > I like branches on public repositories better than patches when it's > time to install it. I like patches in email better when it comes to > reviewing. Sorry, I sent it before finishing it. The two remaining items were: - email patches suck for large changes (even if it's only for review). - these are just preferences, but I'm fine with either. Stefan