From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using incremental parsing in Emacs (via: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83o8sf3r7i.fsf@gnu.org> <364B2177-3E83-4230-A019-0BBD0F1151FB@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="11590"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Andrea Corallo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 15:34:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIuYb-0002uB-LQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:34:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIuYa-0002sI-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:34:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIuXy-0002Sk-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIuXv-0006MT-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:47162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIuXs-0006Ig-MX; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B27AE44FA46; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CB1D44FA2F; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585575218; bh=qPgs1ba0pXa6wCAysk3OIzsV951HI/c9eqXuwTVCeCQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NdKRaoQuhfyPhQ6p3cdwx9pHMAFZHlZ4OzThTcU5wjn2VMA/mYig7GlcIJcbJk65f ztGlEImd3yVcYiIweov0qh1XSoxkWhu66kLdswtme9rL1zN/kJc4kEsMPJ2DLzTEVZ nbe61yBefADLUKfHqJhlaBoTfjScAQckZSP/t4Vc0jE9sxS74KxetYj2f2KJwVllqE h4xGb7stSNAKcM84dX+1hsgHVfUQmSr4+/RNtGZ4rMv/7eJI2EcXa8ttSq4+UXzFjd cEJuT3mEuH9XDPAM3KS27wzYiP3jsgSzVYZ6U7LdyIDgMujNFOfEDp3mXnPlCQiNF2 5Zz3ziFbwS3Xw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BA6A120B17; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:33:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <364B2177-3E83-4230-A019-0BBD0F1151FB@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:02:07 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246003 Archived-At: > What is "OS-and-architecture-neutral representation of the grammar" and how > it is different from what tree-sitter uses now? I don't know, that's part of the question (well, I know what I mean by an "OS-and-architecture-neutral representation", of course, but I believe you also understand this concept). Stefan