From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83o8sf3r7i.fsf@gnu.org> <2E218879-0F24-4A20-B210-263C8D0BEEA4@gmail.com> <87o8sdn0ot.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="119755"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Yuan Fu , Andrea Corallo , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 30 20:48:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzSs-000V2T-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:48:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55034 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzSr-0000ht-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzR1-0007FH-Le for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzR0-0004n1-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIzQy-0004lQ-QW; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C975781133; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 757D380CA0; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585594009; bh=6XZwJ4QkmYYLF0Kd814uhtvSYJs15Z2MB+onztqaaUM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Esgb47E7qU1pOF+UKbEuDHRwlj4UM+xI0JqGjDk2zm5V/1Y6aohLfDq/wp7bgdddW Y1GI9WT12Sm7M+jhHlR02LAvaINadFlFQI49zW51aTmP0eN0/Sc3fPqihSpiQyk6mc HK/15UpFAX27oBHG/33BNZB8E8btnReTgG1OOyLpnOw5tFKeCNd8sgxOgn7EpRdnEa 3wvHV6bGbt+4khnDctkIQdAkUMCswvmDPgJHy+Ec6bhe3t2XutSOe0adXYzIlGWRsO DjsQX2Or1fCuivv6mlM4+C1NVsPXkfseDFQb1HapnE1kdmiQs+vbb+4s/wEib6le8Y oVNjmVAZSM7hg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F66F1205CC; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:46:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87o8sdn0ot.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:43:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246056 Archived-At: > https://gitlab.com/stepnem/stripes-el/-/issues/1#note_309176403 > (In short, `dired-readin' binds `inhibit-modification-hooks' to t, so > the buffer changes caused by populating dired buffers are not noticeable > in `after-change-functions'.) > I was wondering if I should report it as a bug, despite the workaround > not being particularly painful in this case (there's `dired-after-readin-hook'). I think it deserves a bug report, yes. Stefan