From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding. Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200419004503.26161.91884@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200419004504.C65772049B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <026ef78c-3c5e-4fd8-8161-0cc2cf5771c0@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="40310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Stefan Kangas , Emacs developers To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 18:33:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZMV-000ANv-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:33:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39136 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZMU-0006lu-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50012 helo=eggs1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZLs-0006Gz-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs1p.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZLp-0004iH-Tu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43488) by eggs1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZLn-0004cQ-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2FDB81265; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F52580BAF; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1587400368; bh=L3CPRF77Q+GP9qlvkGdC6aIAv0bNXGA6yA3isTHGWyo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=KMJaq8oQXfzh2Xt3uIsRK+Pt/f5aZvFR9DHT2H/9wyHM3IK+6SJ+YQkhC5elUlIUK C5IXiOxhmsWfO3bA1bmQDAxrOZm2uKsxz2XbRvMiq1y96kODNlktm3KJwxfF+jOqJ6 zG3w2F7Fm1cta5HNevN6jzuMTw9KSx0wXexlEwNTqdySPxESGAgprK+i/O847CrzeM SG1+0FJq8jKAxsfc/88zJjCc6NAfizW1JKQ//AfRWMViLGoy7mT0O+NygRkv3WeVIi wUMmXuvV9M71lWRJv0WHxH/x2OCxHoEgO0N+EgzLGgCzY9mU4jhAMVT+22Or9Q6llD SD3xfD6spBVdA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C2D12015D; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:32:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <026ef78c-3c5e-4fd8-8161-0cc2cf5771c0@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:55:27 -0700 (PDT)") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs1p.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/20 09:09:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247399 Archived-At: >> If you don't use `i` there, then you should do: >> (let (alist) >> (dotimes (i 10) (push i alist)) >> alist) > > Doesn't seem right to have such a distinction. It does seem right to me (probably because I find hiding the return value inside the first arg to `dotimes` to be a bad practice). > Is this just an implementation artifact It's mostly an implementation artifact, but one which I think happens to be good. Stefan