From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:04:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2hhri3n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn2tkfg8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rf7ippu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6trg6mc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im8f951f.fsf@gnus.org> <83lfdacapo.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnwsbuwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtxo4tph.fsf@gnus.org> <1ec588b7-795b-6cc4-f346-67cb386e72ed@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , Lars Ingebrigtsen , juri@linkov.net, Eli Zaretskii , drew.adams@oracle.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 19:04:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwUDi-0007ea-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 19:04:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwUDh-0008GI-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:04:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwUBF-0005eu-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:45300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwUBA-0002MI-Vd; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 83A308091E; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:02:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 449CE80675; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:02:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1609783321; bh=vlpqPfAFWdsu9M0ozQfrnR4L/ETkY41tEeQE3u5BodM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bEQxVUAK/b1sIHEj9UljrmytAxihUrBFzGVS0GNkkNMn4MKA1Grczw6YLRTvJW90B VP/XyknOXU1M+e/ZoVyJ7e/oCvtGUR/IQRdamu0Sxp35r37x07rv6jAse4CQazsPVd b40K9VPipsWVSyXbCCut6Gqhqxws+4gotD1CfHH10S/lUUVztgje6cyGmZv0o+l+bf tr4ZoCdOtN2+4W3uPEqGsuDW9vdkRfYsA9EhcUWGZR6u4s+E8/GaVlaCQgEsSbtU01 oCRGntwsEo5CikoUAkMT7DlTMYSmdwN7XGG24bxhLO9YqLXI4MY0MW4o08Znaf5CJI ro6+CTrmBDY5A== Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26019120126; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 13:02:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1ec588b7-795b-6cc4-f346-67cb386e72ed@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:20:56 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262463 Archived-At: > That's a pipe dream. My announcement back then was: [...] > What could I have done more? Nothing. But if we together decide we want to encourage such experiments, then the reaction to people's complaints should provide better moral support to the implementer (you in this case) ;-) Stefan