From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico-posframe Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:19:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6964c9e6.241f.17cb569b4e1.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <8735oprskj.fsf@posteo.net> <1e678e62.646.17cba0ee3cf.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <87ee88gs4a.fsf@gmx.com> <379342f2-dafa-5730-8953-1f78f3f48ee2@daniel-mendler.de> <87pmrrk9vl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37971"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Daniel Mendler , =?windows-1252?Q?I=F1igo?= Serna , tumashu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 20:44:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfRRC-0009ZH-Jk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:44:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfRRA-0002OC-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfR47-0000Ds-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:18400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfR42-0005uY-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:20:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C8682441368; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:20:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 66D84440F69; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:20:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1635272441; bh=m1xwFC2KBpMjm4qOBYTd2VTZKvrC2n291hGBVKSeivQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=afTl4BwT9jQ2PdriaaoLlSrIab4oH7c63SwNBttGJOrFnJe476BUpYZfBhdw3MU5l gEuEi0SlY5X6idVfZ+/CJ1ehFEUGYQG9edD5vL9RrOdxJp1nuerQsK9NnGqgQzFFmP 9OVqpa7A0/1FL7WhUM0oAyGECnpPxjbUmyvUn8ee26nAZdfLmvxwqpR+LHiu2uw896 pX9QNRhNZwjkhvW2M+igkSuW8+uwdpNl8ATz/pr2j/ykhV3apHjc/rVFulYFfMvBXt wYI/r2qovOv7TbmWT5NgA7U4M5YAiovGHN6vQ5SbE7lEqOUBZjmXAtKa6QxYloZocE v1pmkvgoCzTcg== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FC07120313; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:20:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87pmrrk9vl.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:51:10 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277919 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic [2021-10-26 16:51:10] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >>> Indeed, the packages should not be bundled together. vertico-posframe is >>> an independent component, which pulls in a third-party dependency. >> >> I don't have an opinion on how those should be packaged, but I'll just >> point out that Vertico would not needed to have `posframe` in its >> `Package-Requires` in order to provide support for Posframe. > > Yes, this was what I was thinking about. A soft dependency that would > raise an error of the posframe part were actually required, but would > otherwise ignore it. > > But as Daniel has said he prefers not to do it this way, we can add > vertico-posframe as a separate package. Yes, either way is fine. Stefan