From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enabling native compilation by default when libgccjit is present Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 23:49:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87czmdqpv9.fsf@web.de> <83h7bo7rvz.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl1tjage.fsf@web.de> <877dchj9cu.fsf@web.de> <83ee6ozfb0.fsf@gnu.org> <87tufjqzo1.fsf@igel.home> <83r1anw7t5.fsf@gnu.org> <8735n2pqms.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19470"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 09 05:50:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mvBO0-0004sP-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 05:50:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvBNx-00035q-6x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 23:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvBN6-0002Q4-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 23:49:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:27925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvBMv-0003vD-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2021 23:49:32 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CC99A10028A; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 23:49:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1413910016E; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 23:49:17 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1639025357; bh=CK7gAaOvoQeqENIVI8ABN+6hwFd/+DOgjwuCHT8uTws=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fqXcrGQZ/e2MtEQz5WjbOr+BXaSfmRhHHxvusbmqFjiB+Y1mxsEnhqE9dmyAnfqSX lAj+r9BFGDA7L3TvAdHwVs6iERheM/UvtioPWpgTxNQiHq+k6f72mg4Qc3IIG6Tx5L OgWYiuFLOVT7rehLPNfMUPgi9+sYzxdi/KYe3y6hWnp3rkTOX8dTf9tfQw23dc6ZNu 2K/Gy2MDxADxIqXyX1ztpfMRMVcFwu5JjRZ3RN+lCb8Wsy6sxAWIR/tYR1/BG/W7PF 80MxoRdiCh+D/MdFDkQV4Bnn8GqytPaDakHc2wY/rlldRQLXUozXk2l4T47Cms3fLy Z8RFCDYMggo2g== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A684120BD9; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 23:49:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8735n2pqms.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 09 Dec 2021 01:29:31 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281433 Archived-At: > amount of the warnings is from compiling it. The kinds of those > warnings are more of the type 'macro or variable used before defining > it' instead of dependency problems. Such warnings usually imply real errors (the resulting file will not work properly because it contains code that "calls" a macro as if it were a function (i.e. after have evaluated the arguments)). Stefan