From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tentative release schedule for Emacs 29.1 Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87o7v65e0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87edw15l0x.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmflysdt.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsejv7a5.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a64rfqm6.fsf@yahoo.com> <83iljfgi14.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10512"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Po Lu , bzg@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, yantar92@posteo.net, kyle@kyleam.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 15:00:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ovIxk-0002Y0-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:00:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovIpX-0004hF-BU; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovIpT-0004dd-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovIpR-0001Nt-FJ; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C81778006F; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7C03980436; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:44 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1668606704; bh=bAL5vmWo6JdomZxE0VebtvXBZb6MYCn1KqaRPgucz1k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=GeM08TC6MMgBGIyhT6cCQ92uGBAnYeznQdHNW+ghdqCWvtVAON2gxGi25NMbsaK1Y xoMB0WOfBsfBTHqNtighGMrKSz16S26aK1Az9SKIIQJazovMe06wtlhzga18TtIcUb DxZzTPBKupmhBX+DEejRmO17I1hh5e0wyqu5OZHaMWZr62GG7zkhRsIhHtWwC/TFHi lMZd3MY6QgweEqk8YUZTLLd01qNUdV2zCz86pVHGa9Varb1in38xN3OYE6xzaXwoes /YNKTi7l6wdZZJLhtMsgEHS2u8fuHJl1xrFCeq0lnA/YFsJzbScVaTRqoTa1KTmdv9 hAaEy5wmL/rHg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [104.247.241.157]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE174120CE3; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:51:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83iljfgi14.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:12:23 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299929 Archived-At: >> I think we should not cut the branch until bug#59183 is fixed. I run >> into that serious crash every few days. > We will not release Emacs 29.1 with that bug, that's for sure. But I > don't want to wait for its solution before cutting the release branch, > since we can continue working on it after the branching. FWIW, a fix is in the works. It doesn't require drastic changes (a few new functions in itree.c, admittedly, but basically nothing changed outside of it). Stefan