From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-g crash redux Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:35:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877j1qvp4k.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <17617.8764.824445.882539@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87psfi4fon.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17617.35905.981639.63129@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87psfithio.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154590583 3508 80.91.229.2 (3 Aug 2006 07:36:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Roberts , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 03 09:36:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8XkY-0006Fq-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:36:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8XkV-0002on-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8XkG-0002oR-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8XkD-0002nS-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:35:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8XkC-0002nP-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.54] (helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G8XnS-0000cF-Ow for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([70.55.82.144]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060803073542.WRIG13241.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@localhost>; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:35:42 -0400 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 952C88428; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 03:35:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Romain Francoise In-Reply-To: <87psfithio.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> (Romain Francoise's message of "Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:17:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58034 Archived-At: > | /* Binds and unbinds are supposed to be compiled balanced. */ > | if (SPECPDL_INDEX () != count) > | #ifdef BYTE_CODE_SAFE > | error ("binding stack not balanced (serious byte compiler bug)"); > | #else > | abort (); > | #endif > I'm curious to know: if the error is recoverable, why abort? > The BYTE_CODE_SAFE branch certainly seems to suggest that it is > recoverable... Grep for BYTE_CODE_SAFE and you'll see that in order for the error to be recoverable, we need to do extra work. Stefan