From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] espresso-mode breaks on JSON input Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0909111619y192b2dccv79a2181c82438913@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252729127 29069 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2009 04:18:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel , Deniz Dogan To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 12 06:18:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MmK4N-0001SW-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:18:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmK4M-0008Cl-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmK4J-0008Cg-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmK4E-00089n-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55027 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmK4E-00089k-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.248.154.181] (port=11748 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmK4D-0002es-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:30 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMEAN29qkpFpZBe/2dsb2JhbACBU9oOhBgFh3I X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,374,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="45598256" Original-Received: from 69-165-144-94.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.144.94]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2009 00:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2C3F6B40D4; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:18:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Colascione's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:25:51 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115214 Archived-At: > Just FYI, patch(1) can cope with emails that include a patch at the > end. It's usually better to include a patch inline than to attach it. > Doing it that way makes patches easier to discuss. Ironically your patch got mangled along the way ;-) Stefan