From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proposed patch to fix GnuTLS handshake bug (bug#11143 and bug#10904) Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:02:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87hawtohty.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333940547 23209 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2012 03:02:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 03:02:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 09 05:02:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SH4s4-0003oO-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 05:02:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH4s3-0006qC-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH4s0-0006q7-OR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:02:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH4rz-0002w0-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:41607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SH4ry-0002vo-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:02:18 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApUIACxOgk/O+KRD/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYoCws0EhQYDYhABbYyi2GBVYMkBKRFgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="172804809" Original-Received: from 206-248-164-67.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([206.248.164.67]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Apr 2012 23:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D972DAE203; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 23:02:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87hawtohty.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:43:37 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149490 Archived-At: > I think it's worth putting into 24.1 despite the code freeze. I think > it's low-risk and potentially very good for the Emacs users. The fault > for delaying the bug fix until now is entirely mine; sorry about that. The patch looks acceptable, but please add some comment to it, explaining why retries are needed and why they need to be bounded. Stefan