From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: coccinelle patch suggestion Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:05:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4FEC506D.90408@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340906767 13531 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2012 18:06:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 28 20:06:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJ6R-0000LT-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:06:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47251 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJ6Q-0006BQ-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJ6N-0006BG-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJ6K-0001Rz-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:45983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SkJ6J-0001RW-UX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5SI5rYH011621; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6F4C9B4161; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:05:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4FEC506D.90408@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:39:09 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4264=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4264> : streams <775691> : uri <1151729> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151270 Archived-At: > +10. Of course, it would be a toy task for coccinelle. But, IMHO, > EXFUN makes the things clearer rather than obfuscating them. Agreed. An alternative is to autogenerate all the EXFUNs for all F functions into src/global.h, to make it more Lispy. Stefan