From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116379: Replace "Maintainer: FSF" with the emacs-devel mailing address Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1lfvnqvqmk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392059317 27887 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 19:08:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 20:08:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCwDh-0000A2-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:08:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCwDg-0005uH-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCwDX-0005tT-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCwDR-0007QF-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:52416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCwDR-0007QA-M3; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+KAF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYYCwULCw4mEhQYDQ0XE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+KAF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYYCwULCw4mEhQYDQ0XE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="47223192" Original-Received: from 206-248-160-5.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.160.5]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 761586011D; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1lfvnqvqmk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:12:19 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169513 Archived-At: > Not sure I agree, but I certainly would not object to adding something > about a Maintainer being wanted in some cases (but not all). But then > interested people should contact... emacs-devel. For files included in Emacs, then I don't see a need to include extra references to emacs-devel@gnu.org (just like we don't have such in the C files). For files in ELPA, emacs-devel@gnu.org isn't right either: the maintainer address is where the commit-script sends a copy of the diff, and I don't think we don't want to send those to emacs-devel@gnu.org. Stefan